Med Laser 2021; 10(2): 96-105
Application of 630-nm and 850-nm Light-emitting Diodes and Microcurrent to Accelerate Collagen and Elastin Deposition in Porcine Skin
Tae-Rin Kwon1, Dong Wook Moon1, Jungwook Kim1, Hyoung Jun Kim1, Seong Jae Lee1, Yunhee Han1, Hee Won Dan1, Sang Hoon Chi1, Hwan Mo Seong1, Hee Jung Kim2, Guei-Sam Lim2, Jungkwan Lee1
1Home Entertainment Company, LG Electronics, Seoul, Korea
2Advanced R&BD Center, CTO, LG Electronics, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Tae-Rin Kwon
Home Entertainment Company, LG Electronics, 222 LG-ro, Jinwi-myeon, Pyeongtaek 17709, Korea Tel.: +82-31-686-4676
Fax: +82-31-610-5134
Received: May 24, 2021; Accepted: May 27, 2021; Published online: June 30, 2021.
© Korean Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Background and Objectives
Skin aging is reportedly associated with regulation in collagen and elastin synthesis. This study investigated the potential of combining light-emitting diode (LED) treatments using a 630-nm and 850-nm LED with simultaneous microcurrent application.
Materials and Methods
The dorsal skin of female pigs was treated with a home-use device. We examined the treatment effects using photography, thermocamera, microscopic pathology, and histological examination to determine the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of the procedure. A histological observation was performed using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, Victoria blue, and immunohistochemical staining. We also used the Sircol soluble collagen and elastin assay kit to measure the amounts of collagen and elastin in the porcine back skin tissue after 2 and 6 weeks.
Evaluation by visual inspection and devices showed no skin damage or heat-induced injury at the treatment site. Histological staining revealed that accurate treatment of the targeted dermis layer effectively enhanced collagen and elastin deposition. Collagen type I, a protein defined by immunohistochemical staining, was overexpressed in the early stages of weeks 2 and 6. Combined therapy findings showed the superior capability of the 630-nm and 850-nm LED procedures to induce collagen; in contrast, elastin induction was more pronounced after microcurrent treatments.
The home-use LED device, comprising a combination of 630-nm and 850-nm LEDs and microcurrent, is safe and can be used as an adjunctive treatment for self-administered facial rejuvenation.
Keywords: Microcurrent; Low-level light therapy; Collagen; Elastin; Combination

With the introduction of new cosmetic techniques, the demand for non-invasive, long-lasting treatments to reduce facial wrinkles and relaxation has increased dramatically over the past decades.1 Aging is a functional, structural, and biochemical change that occurs across the cells and organs of the body.2 In human skin, hormone secretion decreases over time, and the function and activity of immune cells decrease, resulting in decreased biosynthesis of biological proteins. This results from endogenous aging and externally contaminated air, drugs, and photoaging caused by ultraviolet rays. In sun-damaged skin, collagen synthesis decreases as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) increases.3 Therefore, as a strategy to prevent or treat medical signs of skin aging, collagen deficiency can be relieved through MMP reduction and new collagen synthesis. It has been reported that the use of various light-emitting diode (LED) light sources that emit light corresponding to wavelengths in the visible and near-infrared regions can enhance skin collagen synthesis and simultaneously suppress the increase in MMP.4 After irradiating the red LED light source through various experiments, a remarkable increase in collagen synthesis was reported.5

In addition, a microcurrent leads to a weak current of less than 1000 μA. Approximately 40 μA to 60 μA of ‘bioelectricity’ flows into the human body.6 Bioelectricity is a chemical reaction in the body caused by the constant exchange of various ions such as Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl- through the cell membrane, which refers to the generation of minute electricity in this process as the materials carrying the electrodes are reversed. Bioelectricity, which occurs in the basic process of metabolism in the human body, is connected to the activation, growth, regeneration, and healing processes of cells, including signal transmission, muscle contraction, secretion of substances, and stimulus reception.7 However, performance and safety evaluation are essential to confirm the efficacy of various variables generated while delivering complex energy and efficacy when used in combination.

In the current study, we examined the efficacy and safety of a home-use device in improving skin regeneration using a pig model by using the devices twice a week for the two months. Pre-clinical efficacy was evaluated through investigator assessments and instrumental analysis for the objective measurement of elastin and collagen content.

First-generation home appliances that emit low-intensity red/infrared or bipolar radiofrequency have been shown to produce minor improvements in wrinkles and/or skin texture due to the penetration of energy into the surface area.8 Laser-based home devices have recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of periorbital wrinkles; nevertheless, they have limitations because they cannot treat large areas, depend on the skin type, and are associated with pain.

This study establishes that the use of EWN1 wearable devices in combination with eye patches can lead to significant improvements in facial skin condition and rejuvenation after 2 and 6 weeks of use. Instrumental assessments showed significant improvements in skin collagen content, firmness, and elasticity throughout the 6-week study period. Interestingly, the greatest improvement first appeared after 2 weeks of use and gradually increased in effect and statistical significance at 6 weeks. We confirm that this dose-dependent improvement is due in part to the physiology of energy-based collagen remodeling. Data on performance is one of the data required to be submitted for review of technical documents, etc., and in particular, corresponds to data proving the effectiveness of medical devices used for diagnosis or treatment. If the performance of the device cannot be confirmed through an in vitro test, the performance of the device must be verified using test data for animals. In this case, refer to the thesis and literature for the standards and test methods of animal test data.

The results of this study indicate that the EWN1 multisource home-use device offers a non-invasive, effective, safe, and painless treatment option for self-administered skin rejuvenation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that two energy-based home use facial rejuvenation devices have been tested in a controlled pre-clinical study using both visual and instrumental assessments for improved skin rejuvenation. The EWN1 wearable device was demonstrated to be safe for facial locations with minimal downtime and unwanted side effects.

This study was designed to determine whether patients could safely and effectively apply a novel wearable LEDs and microcurrent device intended for home use to improve skin rejuvenation by stimulating collagen and elastin.


Animals and experimental design

In this study, female pigs (n = 2, 4 sites) obtained from the closed barrier unit at CRONEX (Hwasung, Korea) were used. They were housed individually under controlled environmental conditions (temperature, 18-22°C; relative air humidity, 30-70%; 15 air changes/h; 12:12-h light-dark cycle). After each pig’s general condition and weight (range, 40-50 kg) were confirmed, they were placed under preliminary anesthesia by intramuscular injection using a 3-ml mixture of zoletil 50 (tiletamine hydrochloride plus zolazepam hydrochloride, Virbac S.A, France) and Rompun (xylazine hydrochloride, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) at a ratio of 6:4. Each subject was then moved to an operating room, laid on the operating table, and 2 ml of the same mixture was administered via intravenous injection. The airway was secured using a laryngoscope, and an intubation tube (8.5 Fr) was inserted. Terel solution (isoflurane; Piramal Critical Care, Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) and oxygen was mixed at a 2:1 ratio, and the mixture was used as inhalation anesthesia before treating the dorsal skin areas using the EWN1 home-use device (LG Electronics, Seoul, Korea) (Fig. 1). 'Eye Care' is a type of collagen care in which LG PraL's exclusive 630-nm and 850-nm LED for the eye area is added to the microcurrent, and it intensively manages the skin around the eyes.

Figure 1. The 630- and 850-nm light-emitting diode (LED) with microcurrent device for skin rejuvenation. (A, B) The EWN1 device (obtained from LG electronics Inc., with permission). (C) Performance evaluation of surface delivered energy for 630-nm and 850-nm LED and microcurrent treatment by computer aided engineering (CAE) measurement.

Treatment using 630-nm and 850-nm LED only, microcurrent only, and combination (Basic Care Mode (9 min operation) level 1 and 3 (LED 25 mW Spectrometer, Integration Range: 550-710 nm, Wavelength 630 nm/LED 25 mW Spectrometer, Integration Range: 790-910 nm, Wavelength 850 nm/Microcurrent DC ± 7.5V, 1 level : 100-80-100 μA cycle, 3 level : 100-150-200-100-150 μA cycle) was performed twice a weeks for 2 and 6 weeks. The pigs were followed for 42 days (6 weeks) post-treatment before being humanely sacrificed. All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided by the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of CRONEX, Republic of Korea (Approval Number:2020-09001).

Observation and examination

After anesthetizing Yorkshire pigs, the back area was epilated to apply EWN1 device. EWN1 treatment was performed according to each condition. The skin conditions of the treated and untreated areas (patch only) were observed to evaluate the skin irritation caused by the use of the EWN1 device. Immediately after treatment (day 0), 1 d after treatment (day 1), 7 days (day 7), 14 days (2 weeks), and 42 days (6 weeks), visual evaluation was performed by the research director.

The skin tissue was biopsied at weeks 2 and 6 and used for the performance evaluation. Skin surface measurements of the temperature distribution following treatment were performed on porcine back skin using an infrared thermography system (TVS-200EX; Avionics, Tokyo, Japan). Standardized flash photography of the treated and adjacent areas was performed using a folliscope (LeedM, Seoul, Korea) (Data not shown). The skin of Yorkshire white pigs had similar absorption, allergic reaction, and epithelial structure to humans, making it suitable for dermal administration skin test.9 Since the skin has less body hair than other species, it is easy to use for skin test evaluation.

Histological examination

After treating the EWN1 device, hematoxyline and eosin (H&E), Masson’s trichrome (M&T), and Victoria blue staining were performed for histopathological and cell survival rate evaluation in the skin tissue. After 14 days of treatment (week 2) and after 42 days (week 6), an 8 mm punch biopsy was performed to store the biopsied skin tissue. The tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Next, 5-μm-thick sections were transferred to probe-on-plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA, USA) and stained with H&E, M&T, and Victoria blue.

Measurement of collagen production in the skin

Sircol soluble collagen assay kit (Biocolor, Belfast, UK) was used to measure the amount of collagen contained in the skin tissues of all groups. A kit was purchased, and a collagen assay was performed. The skin tissue had the same weight. Pepsin and 0.5M acetic acid (1:10 ratio of pepsin/tissue wet weight) were added, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C. Subsequently, 100 μL of Sircol dye reagent was added, followed by shaking for 30 min and shaking for 10 min at 12,000 rpm. After centrifugation, 750 μL of acid-salt wash was added, and the mixture was washed with water followed by lightly mixing an alkali reagent in the microplate. This was measured at a wavelength of 555 nm. For the collagen calibration standard curve, a reference point was set by adding 0, 5, 10, and 15 μL of collagen standard solution (0.5 mg/mL) each.

Measurement of the amount of elastin produced in the skin

The effect on elastin synthesis was observed using the FASTIN elastin assay (Biocolor). Samples or standards were mixed in the same amount with the precipitation reagent (0.25 M oxalic acid), left for 10 min, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed; 1 mL of Fastin Dye Reagent was added, reacted for 90 min, and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min to separate the elastin-dye complex. The supernatant was removed, 250 μL of dye dissociation reagent was added, mixed, and absorbance was measured at 513 nm using an ELISA microplate reader. The elastin concentration was calculated after substituting into the α-elastin standard curve.

Immunohistochemical analyses

Immunohistochemical staining for collagen type I (Anti-Col1A1, NB600-408; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) involves deparaffining a 4.5 µm-thick paraffin section and washing with xylene, ethanol, distilled water, and the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC), in order. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using this method. The samples were transferred to a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution, quenched at room temperature for 10 minutes, and washed 3 times with 0.1 M tris-buffered saline (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA). After that, they were transferred to 0.05% trypsin and allowed to stand at 37°C for 10 min, washed three times with Tris-buffered saline, and allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 min in a protein blocking agent (Immunon, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) to saturate the non-specific protein binding site. After washing the sections with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), they were incubated with the primary antigen overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS for 5 min, they were left in biotinylated universal secondary antibody reagent (Immunon) for 30 min, and then washed with PBS for 10 min. They were reacted with horseradish peroxidase at room temperature for 30 min, washed three times with PBS for 5 min with care, and reacted with diaminobenzidine (DAB). Contrast staining with Mayer's hematoxylin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was observed under a microscope.

These corrected images were then imported into ImageJ software (NIH) ( where a region of interest was defined by the epidermis and dermal layer. The percentage of black pixels was taken to represent the percentage of tissue within the skin section.10

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. For statistical analysis of each set of data, Student's t-test was performed. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Instrument and histological evaluation

To determine whether the skin was irritated by the EWN1 device, the skin conditions of the treated and untreated areas were observed. All evaluations were conducted immediately after irradiation (day 0) and before and after the device treatment for 6 weeks. During the test period, a visual evaluation was conducted by the research director. In all treatment groups, no adverse skin reactions, including epidermal damage, erythema including blisters, and heat damage reactions, were observed in the visual evaluation (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2. Thermal and histological changes after treatment. (A) Surface temperature changes of the porcine model during application of 630-nm and 850-nm LED and microcurrent and after device removal immediately after treatment. This device delivered heat did not affect surrounding skin tissue. (B) Tissue biopsy was done before 630-nm and 850-nm LED and microcurrent treatment (0), and on weeks 2, 6. The histological effect of the device on porcine dorsal skin was analyzed using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stain (×100). Simultaneous samples are showing greater vascularization, denser organization, and thickness of connective fibers in comparison with the control. LLLT, low-level light therapy.

To observe the change in the skin surface condition according to the EWN1 device treatment, magnification was taken with a Folliscope (Data not shown). At different time points after skin treatment using the device during the period (treatment twice a week) according to each condition (immediately after irradiation [day 0], after 14 days [after 2 weeks, 4 times], and after 42 days [after 6 weeks, 12 times]), no difference in heat damage and erythema were observed on the skin surface in comparison with the untreated control group. Standard treatment protocols are for treatments of 15 min for a 10 × 10 cm area, keeping the surface temperature at 33.3°C to 36.8°C. Importantly, the combination treatment was much more effective in absorbing energy than the LED or microcurrent single treatments.

After the EWN1 device treatment, H&E staining was performed for histopathological evaluation of the skin. As shown in Fig. 2B, no abnormal infiltration or dermal necrosis of inflammatory cells was observed in any skin tissues of the no treatment, microcurrent only, LEDs only, LEDs/Microcurrent combination treatment, and no epidermal damage or adverse reactions in the dermis were observed.

Combination of 630-and 850-nm LEDs/Microcurrent induced collagen and elastin synthesis

Collagen is the main component of the skin dermis, and it decreases with age, causing wrinkles in the skin. To confirm the formation of collagen in the skin tissue after EWN1 device treatment (Fig. 3B). As a result of collagen synthesis, at week 2 (use 4 times), there was a statistically significant increase in the LEDs group (2.31-fold, 130.5% increase) and the LEDs/Microcurrent combination group (2.70-fold, 169.8% increase) compared to the no treatment group. In the 6th week (use 12 times) result, compared to no treatment, the LEDs group (1.25-fold, 74.6% increased), the microcurrent alone group (1.68-fold, 68.0% increased), and the combined LEDs/Microcurrent group (2.25-fold, 124.6% increase), a statistically significant increase in all was confirmed (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3. Change of collagen within porcine skin samples. (A) In addition tissue samples were solubilized and the Sircol collagen extracted and quantified in μg/mg tissue ± standard deviation (SD) by colorimetric assay. Statistically significant variations were indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (B) Skin samples were stained with Masson’s trichrome. Collagen fibers were stained in blue, and pictures were taken at ×100.

In addition, as a result of the amount of elastin synthesis, statistically significant increases were observed in the microcurrent alone group (1.25-fold, 25.3% increase) and LEDs group (1.72-fold, 71.8% increase) compared to no treatment at week 2 (use 4 times). In the 6th week (12 uses), statistically significant increases were found in the microcurrent alone group (1.63-fold, 63.5% increase) and the LEDs/Microcurrent combination group (1.92-fold, 91.9% increase) compared to the no treatment group (Fig. 4A). The LEDs/Microcurrent used in this procedure collectively acts on the epidermis and dermis layer of the skin, inducing regeneration of collagen and elastic fibers through cell activation and a complex process such as synthesis and reconstruction of collagen fibers. These results strongly suggest that collagen and elastin biosynthesis is affected by the combination of LEDs/Microcurrent.

Figure 4. Change of elastin within porcine skin samples. (A) In addition tissue samples were solubilized and the Elastin extracted and quantified in μg/mg tissue (±SD) by colorimetric assay. Statistically significant variations were indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (B) Skin samples were stained with Victoria blue. Elastin fibers were stained in blue, and pictures were taken at ×100. The amount of elastin stained in blue significantly increased post-treatment compared with control.

The 630- and 850-nm LEDs/Microcurrent induces neocollagenesis and neoelastinogenesis

Next, the change, loss, amount, and morphology of elastic fibers in the dermal layer of the skin were observed using Victoria blue staining (blue color; elastic fibers) (Fig. 4B). Overall, an increase in elastic fibers was seen both 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. As a result, it is thought that the LEDs/Microcurrent energy generated in EWN1 is evenly transmitted to the skin layer, affecting skin elasticity.

In this experiment, it was confirmed whether treatment with the EWN1 device has an effect on collagen synthesis in the dermis, and changes in the morphology of collagen fibers were observed in the process of tissue restoration after applying LEDs/Microcurrent. Upon observation with an optical microscope, the collagen fibers in all test groups were relatively denser and had more regular arrangement in the tissue after the device treatment compared to the untreated group (Fig. 5A). In particular, after treatment with the microcurrent, the change was evident in the upper part of the epidermis and dermis, and after treatment with LEDs, it was confirmed that there was an effect on the lower part of the dermis. As a result, it is believed that the combination treatment of LEDs/Microcurrent evenly affects the skin layers by transferring energy from the skin surface.

Figure 5. Immunohistochemistry for COL1A1 in skin of porcine treated or untreated with 630-and 850-nm LED and microcurrent. Upregulated COL1A1 expression at protein levels strongly correlates with simultaneously 630-nm and 850-nm LED and microcurrent application. (A) Representative immunohistochemical photo-image (upper) and (B) graphical quantification (lower) of COL1A1 protein expression in each group. COL1A1 is highly expressed in 630-nm and 850-nm LED only and microcurrent only group compared to combined treatment. Statistically significant variations were indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (vs Control), #p < 0.05 (vs 2 weeks).

Also, type I collagen staining was performed by immunohistochemical staining, and the changes in collagen in the dermal layer of the skin were observed by EWN1 device treatment (Fig. 5B). LED technology is known to improve wrinkles by inducing collagen synthesis by selectively stimulating the production of collagen in the papillary dermis and upper reticular dermis without damaging the epidermis. Accordingly, the pattern of the collagen fibers was observed to be tighter in the treated groups than in the untreated group. Thus, at the 6th week of use, an increase in collagen and elastic fibers was found at the top of the dermis in the skin of the test group.


The convergence of advanced technology improves the efficacy, ease of use, and safety of aesthetic devices.11 It is expected to continue to grow in the future in a social environment that places more importance on the convenience and well-being of each patient. A deeper understanding of intrinsic and extrinsic factors contributing to changes in the face.12

Although individualized combination therapy reflected modern esthetic practice in 2014, nearly half of all cosmetic patients in the United States requesting noninvasive or minimally invasive interventions received multiple cosmetic procedures at the same time.13 A multifaceted approach that safely incorporates two or more modalities—administered concomitantly or in the recommended sequence—is required along with an ongoing skincare regimen for optimal esthetic benefits.14,15 The combined application of these energies resulted in enhanced synergistic effects in several instances.16,17 In particular, a previous study reported the clinical experience of the lifting effect through the simultaneous investigation of HIFU and RF.18 HIFU affects deep tissues and impacts the focal regions. Monopolar RF also affects deep tissues but impacts diffuse regions. We believe that these data provide further insights into effective skin tightening. Compared with the consecutive application of the modalities, the simultaneous use of these two fields has a more beneficial effect on animal dermal and subdermal tissues. This porcine model study indicates that the simultaneous application of LEDs/Microcurrent may be a suitable treatment for various skin conditions, such as rejuvenation.

The use of electricity, electrical stimulation, and electromagnetic fields is not new in medicine. Studies have shown that by externally applying an electric field or electric current, potentials present inside and between cells in soft tissues can facilitate biological and physiological changes in these tissues. In fact, there is strong experimental evidence suggesting that tendon repair can be significantly affected by electrical stimulation with intensity at the microcurrent level.19 Microcurrent is understood to be distinct from other forms of therapeutic electrical stimulation because the current intensity is much less than that of other forms of electrotherapy, such as percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or paradic units. Microcurrent applications are believed to be effective in affecting and modifying cellular processes and activities.20 The use of different levels of current, frequency, and polarity has been shown to have various effects on different cell groups.

Low-intensity phototherapy, commonly referred to as &quot;photobiomodulation,” modulates numerous cellular functions by light in the far-infrared to near-infrared (NIR) regions of the spectrum (630-1000 nm).21 At the cellular level, photobiological regulation can stimulate macrophages and lymphocytes by regulating fibroblast proliferation and adhesion and synthesis of collagen and procollagen, promoting angiogenesis and improving energy metabolism within the mitochondria.22 In addition, photobiomodulation has been demonstrated to promote the production of growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). However, our study had several limitations. Further study is needed to confirm and elucidate the reasons for these growth factors.

Previous findings were able to correlate fibroblast activity with the process of dermal matrix remodeling, with increased intradermal collagen density and decreased signs of aging. The proposed underlying mechanisms include photostimulation of terminal molecules in the electron transport chain and subsequent increase in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration, selective photodriven activation of water molecules to enhance metabolic exchange and affect the ion transport systems found in the cell membrane. Detailed analysis of the gene expression profile of human fibroblasts showed the effect of low-intensity red light with a wavelength of 628 nm on 111 different genes involved in cellular functions such as cell proliferation; apoptosis; stress response; protein, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism; mitochondrial energy metabolism; DNA synthesis and repair; and antioxidant-related functions related to the cytoskeleton and cell-cell interactions.23 The specific role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in increasing fibroblast proliferation and motility has recently been reported; thus, the elevation of ROS through photodynamic therapy can lead to a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway in skin fibroblasts, suggesting that ROS can improve cellular function in vitro.

Simultaneously, LEDs/Microcurrent application can be a useful tool to assess the induction of collagen and elastin remodeling in porcine skin. There is not much difference in the mechanism between LEDs- and microcurrent-induced cell activation, such as ATP synthesis, but synergistic effects are strongly suggested when using the technologies in combination because the actual application areas on the skin are different. Therefore, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the EWN1 device for the skin. Damage to the skin surface, abnormal inflammatory reactions and laceration reactions of the dermis, and tissue necrosis by the device treatment were not observed. Quantitative analysis of the amount of collagen and elastin produced by biopsy of skin tissue showed a statistically significant increase. Observing the change, loss, amount, and shape of the elastic fibers in the skin’s dermal layer under each test condition (microcurrent only, LEDs only, and LEDs/Microcurrent combination), it was confirmed that the regeneration of collagen and elastic fibers was induced in the entire upper and lower layers of the dermis as energy was transferred well from each modality. The LEDs/Microcurrent combination has not yet been studied in a porcine model. In the future, additional studies should be performed to determine the safety and effectiveness of collagen and elastin stimulation in clinical study.

In this study, the effect of the EWN1 device on the production of collagen and elastin in the skin as well as the skin safety of the device was confirmed. However, a limitation was also observed in the amount of collagen and elastin production in the same tissue after 12 times uses compared to four uses, and additional research on the number of uses and long-term use is needed. Simultaneous LEDs/Microcurrent application is, at minimum, non-inferior to individual LED and microcurrent application in terms of collagen and elastin induction. Nevertheless, it has the advantages of less pain, downtime, and frequency of side effects.

These results indicate that simultaneous application of 630-nm and 850-nm LED and microcurrent is an excellent choice for facial skin rejuvenation, indicating the synergistic action of these two modalities.


We thank CRONEX (Hwasung, Korea) for its support in this study.


The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

  1. Benedetto AV. What's new in cosmetic dermatology. Dermatol Clin 2019;37:117-28.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Clarke LH, Korotchenko A. Aging and the body: a review. Can J Aging 2011;30:495-510.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Wang B. Photoaging: a review of current concepts of pathogenesis. J Cutan Med Surg 2011;15 Suppl 1:S374-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Barolet D, Roberge CJ, Auger FA, Boucher A, Germain L. Regulation of skin collagen metabolism in vitro using a pulsed 660 nm LED light source: clinical correlation with a single-blinded study. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:2751-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Li WH, Seo I, Kim B, Fassih A, Southall MD, Parsa R. Low-level red plus near infrared lights combination induces expressions of collagen and elastin in human skin in vitro. Int J Cosmet Sci . In press 2021.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Smith RB. Microcurrent therapies: emerging theories of physiological information processing. NeuroRehabilitation 2002;17:3-7.
  7. He B. Bioelectricity of living tissue. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1998;17:72.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Gold MH, Biron J, Levi L, Sensing W. Safety, efficacy, and usage compliance of home-use device utilizing RF and light energies for treating periorbital wrinkles. J Cosmet Dermatol 2017;16:95-102.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Wei JCJ, Edwards GA, Martin DJ, Huang H, Crichton ML, Kendall MAF. Allometric scaling of skin thickness, elasticity, viscoelasticity to mass for micro-medical device translation: from mice, rats, rabbits, pigs to humans. Sci Rep 2017;7:15885.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:671-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Wang JV, Saedi N, Geronemus RG. Differentiation in a market of imitation: the evolving world of aesthetic dermatology. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020;19:2987-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Sherber NS, Rad AN. Future directions in facial rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 2014;30:72-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Humphrey S, Beleznay K, Fitzgerald R. Combination therapy in midfacial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg 2016;42 Suppl 2:S83-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Nestor MS. Combination therapy in clinical and cosmetic dermatology: the marriage of device and drug. J Drugs Dermatol 2004;3(5 Suppl):S4-11.
  15. Coleman KM, Pozner J. Combination therapy for rejuvenation of the outer thigh and buttock: a review and our experience. Dermatol Surg 2016;42 Suppl 2:S124-30.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Collawn SS. Combination therapy: utilization of CO2 and Erbium:YAG lasers for skin resurfacing. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:21-6.
  17. Omi T, Kawana S, Sato S, Naito Z. Histological evidence for skin rejuvenation using a combination of pneumatic energy, broadband light, and growth factor therapy. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2010;12:222-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Shek SY, Yeung CK, Chan JC, Chan HH. The efficacy of a combination non-thermal focused ultrasound and radiofrequency device for noninvasive body contouring in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 2016;48:203-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Lin YL, Moolenaar H, van Weeren PR, van de Lest CH. Effect of microcurrent electrical tissue stimulation on equine tenocytes in culture. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:271-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Poltawski L, Johnson M, Watson T. Microcurrent therapy in the management of chronic tennis elbow: pilot studies to optimize parameters. Physiother Res Int 2012;17:157-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and mitochondrial redox signaling in photobiomodulation. Photochem Photobiol 2018;94:199-212.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Tatmatsu-Rocha JC, Tim CR, Avo L, Bernardes-Filho R, Brassolatti P, Kido HW, et al. Mitochondrial dynamics (fission and fusion) and collagen production in a rat model of diabetic wound healing treated by photobiomodulation: comparison of 904 nm laser and 850 nm light-emitting diode (LED). J Photochem Photobiol B 2018;187:41-7.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Zhang Y, Song S, Fong CC, Tsang CH, Yang Z, Yang M. cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in human fibroblast cells irradiated with red light. J Invest Dermatol 2003;120:849-57.
    Pubmed CrossRef

This Article