Med Lasers 2022; 11(1): 8-14  https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2022.11.1.8
Appraisal of Recent Developments in Combined Photodynamic Treatment (PDT)/Photobiomodulation (PBM) for Dermal Wound Healing
Andrew Padalhin
Beckman Laser Institute, Cheonan, Korea
Correspondence to: Andrew Padalhin
E-mail: doy_padalhin@yahoo.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3869-5720
Received: March 12, 2022; Accepted: March 15, 2022; Published online: March 30, 2022.
© Korean Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Phototherapy has come a long way from simply relying on sunlight as a light source for the treatment of various dermatological conditions. Several new developments have already found application in clinical settings, and further investigations are currently advancing its utility in combination with other therapeutic approaches. This review presents data from select publications with novel (stand-alone or combined) photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photobiomodulation (PBM) for dermal wound management and skin tissue regeneration. This article specifically includes several therapeutic approaches combined with either photodynamic therapy or photobiomodulation which uses red to near-infrared wavelengths. The noteworthy approaches detailed in the article include the use of PDT for anti-microbial applications; PBM for the management of adverse effects of toxins; dual-wavelength light therapy; the use of PBM with hydrogels; and the combined application of either drug or naturally derived therapeutic agents with PBM.
Keywords: Photobiomodulation; Photodynamic therapy; Combined therapy; Hydrogel; Skin regeneration
INTRODUCTION

Among the skin treatments that have been continuously being developed over the three thousand years is the method of utilizing natural or artificial light for improving health and well-being is called phototherapy.1-3 The past several decades have suggested that certain wavelengths from sunlight such as infrared-A, ultraviolet-B, and ultraviolet-A cause negative effects on human skin, thus sunscreens have been developed to block these wavelengths. Although several studies have noted that near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths can damage skin, this effect is barely observed on artificial sources which can barely reach radiant levels comparable to that of the sun. Previous studies even contradict the negative observations indicating positive cell and tissue response upon exposure to appropriate irradiance/dose of NIR.3 Consequently, some studies have also supported the use of ultraviolet -blue wavelength as non-pharmacological prophylaxis.4-8 Phototherapy covers two types of approach: Photobiomodulation (PBM) and Photodynamic therapy (PDT).

PDT is a method of using chemical agents called photosensitizers to cause cellular death upon exposure and activation with certain light wavelengths.9-11 This type of medical utilization of light energy is fairly widespread in procedures for sterilization, disinfection, and purging tissue eradication such as in cases of malignant cancers.12-17 On the opposite end of PDT is PBM, formerly termed as low-level laser therapy (LLLT) because of the prevalent use of laser technology in earlier research endeavors. This alternative technique of invigorating and promoting regeneration on the largest organ of the body has garnered significant attention since the late 1960s due to the invention of lasers.10,18,19 PBM is a procedure by which certain wavelengths of light are used to elicit stimulatory effects on cells and tissues which eventually contributes to health benefits and even tissue regeneration.10-12,20-25 Both PDT and PBM applications, coherent, highly monochromatic, collimated light with higher power densities are preferred. Nevertheless, recent advancements in technology have provided other light sources like broadband lamps and light-emitting diodes (LED) which do not require significant operational knowledge and high energy inputs to be used for PDT and PBM procedures.20 Recent advancements in the field of biomaterials, pharmaceutics, and medical sciences have also started to incorporate PBM and PDT in hopes of advancing therapeutics for skin disease and wound management.

This review will focus on some notable advancements regarding the use of photodynamic therapy and photobiomodulation for dermal wound management and skin tissue regeneration in the past 5 years. For this manuscript, articles published from 2017 to early 2022 were searched in PUBMED using photodynamic therapy, photobiomodulation, skin, wound, and combined therapy as keywords. The selection was narrowed down to include only research articles and exclude review articles. The particular coverage of this article will include several therapeutic approaches combined with either photodynamic therapy or photobiomodulation which uses red to NIR wavelengths. Among the noteworthy approaches that will be covered are the use of PDT for anti-microbial applications; PBM for management of toxin effects; Dual-wavelength Light therapy; the use of PBM with hydrogels; and the combined application of either drug or naturally derived therapeutic agents with PBM (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Several variations and combinations of PDT and PBM treatments have been investigated for dermal wound management. These include the use of certain wavelength and photosensitizers for antibacterial and PBM function (A); the use of PBM alleviate toxin effects (B); and its synergistic function with drug infusion, hydrogels, and some naturally derived compounds which leads to improved wound healing (C).
THERAPEUTICS COMBINED WITH PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY/PHOTOBIOMODULATION

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy

As mentioned earlier, disinfection is among the most common application of light energy in the medical field. The use of UV and blue light as germicidal agents have been around since 1870s.26 Recent investigations have now focused on advancing the use of the antimicrobial effect of light through PDT application. A recent study conducted by Petrini et al. attempted to verify the potential of using NIR LED and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for long-term inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).27 Although the combined treatment did not result in total inactivation of E. faecalis, their results indicated that the combination of NaOCl and NIR LED irradiation achieved consistently higher photoinactivation for 1 week compared to either LED or NaOCl alone. In a separate study, full-thickness wounds infected with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were treated with a photosensitive agent -Indocyanine Green and irradiated with a diode laser with an 810nm wavelength. Bacterial colonization of S. aureus significantly decreased on infected wounds and improved wound healing after treatment indicating the synergistic effect of the NIR laser photobiomodulation and the photodynamic effect of indocyanine activation on the bacterial load.28 A similar antimicrobial effect was also observed by Wong et al. when using a commercial NIR lamp that outputs non-coherent light to induce antimicrobial PDT on methicillin-resistant S. Waaureus (MRSA).29 Another study also noted the importance of accumulating the proper photosensitizer and targeting the optimal absorption peak for the endogenous photosensitization of gram-positive bacteria. In a study conducted by Walter et al., coproporphyrin III was targeted to induce antimicrobial PDT in gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) through the addition of aminolevulinic acid and small molecule VU0038882, or both. Their results showed that targeting specific molecules required optimization for peak absorption and subsequent endogenous photosensitization.30 The use of different LED wavelengths and multiple light sources for simultaneous PDT and PBM also yielded better results compared to monochromatic settings which will be discussed in the latter section of this article.

Photobiomodulation for toxins

Another more novel application of light energy in the medical field is its utilization as adjuvant therapy after serum therapy following exposure to toxic agents such as snake venom. Several studies have been recently published tackling the positive effects of PBM on tissue exposed to animal poison. Subsequent investigations performed by Pereira Dos Reis et al.31 revealed that LED irradiation (945nm) induced positive effects such as increased mitochondrial metabolism, reduced cytotoxicity, decrease in reactive oxygen species, and nitrogen liberation in activated murine macrophages exposed to bothropstoxin-I (BthTX-I) or bothropstoxin-I (BthTX-II) from Bothrops jararacussu (B. jararacussu) venom.32 Two wavelengths (635 nm and 945 nm) were also tested out using LED to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation on the local pathological effects of Bothrops asper (B. asper).33 The results of the experiments conducted on mice showed that both red and infrared wavelengths reduced edema, inflammatory infiltrate, and myotoxicity warranting further investigation of using PBM for treating local effects of snake bites. Lasers have also been applied for the PBM treatment of snake venom. In a study conducted by Lauria et al, the application of laser treatment (780 or 660 nm) after Bothrops lecurus venom injection in mice effectively reduced edema formation and delayed myotoxicity. PBM has been found to be a suitable complement to antivenom treatment.34 Further study on snake venom demonstrated that PBM was capable of protecting muscle cells from damage and attenuating the inflammatory effects brought about by BthTX-I.35

Dual wavelength PDT-PBM

Having established the utility of light energy as an antimicrobial agent and a stimulant for cell growth and tissue development, several studies have tried to investigate the effects of simultaneous irradiation using two wavelengths. A clinical study conducted by Baracho et al. revealed that several sessions of combined 630 nm and 940 nm LED irradiation successfully enhanced the healing of pressure-induced injuries in patients.36 In another study also involving pressure injury, photobiomodulation was carried out using a combined 660 nm + 810 nm continuous laser. Pressure wounds infected with Pantoea agglomerans were irradiated using this dual simultaneous emitting laser for 14 sessions at 142.8 J/cm2. Results revealed that the irradiated infected wounds developed thinner neo-epidermis, lowered IL-10, and increased IL-1β expression. Thomé Lima, A.M.C. and his group concluded that the dual-wavelength laser improved pressure wound healing by eradicating bioburden and stimulating cells for repair.37 The stimulatory effect of dual-wavelength lasers (630 + 810) has also been recently tested on human-sourced adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs). The dual-wavelength treatment resulted in boosted cell viability and population doubling time of both cell types which could potentially be proven useful for cell maintenance and expansion or procedures involving the cell therapy for dermal wound regeneration.38

Hydrogels and PBM/PDT

Another emerging approach with regards to combining dermal wound management methods is the inclusion of routine irradiation in conjunction with the application of hydrogel biomaterials. Bacterial cellulose membrane has garnered much attention in recent years and has been used in a wide array of biomedical applications, particularly for skin tissue.39-42 One fairly recent publication by Brassolatti et al. and Vasconcellos et al. showed that even though the lone application of either photobiomodulation (660 nm) or bacterial nanocellulose membrane resulted in improved healing in second-degree and third-degree burn animal models, combining these two treatments compromised the development of blood vessels and collagen deposition crucial for the reparative phase of wound healing.43,44 This is in contrast to the following studies which involved hydrogels designed for PDT together which PBM. A study conducted by He et al. aimed at investigating the efficacy of using red light on a PDT-based material to simultaneously perform PBM and antibacterial activity.45 For their experiment, they fabricated a catechol motif-modified methacrylated gelatin with mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles loaded with Chlorin e6 photosensitizer (GelMAc/MPDA@Ce6) which can be used as a wound dressing or coating for other materials. Antibacterial activity was initiated by laser irradiation at 1W cm-2 while PBM stimulation of fibroblasts was achieved with daily irradiation at 100 w cm-2. Their data suggested that both PDT and PBM can be subsequently performed by adjusting irradiation parameters of the hydrogel applied on the wound surface.45 A series of recently published studies by Shanmugapriya et al. showcased the potential of both alginate-based and cellulose-based hydrogels together with laser therapy for wound healing and induction of cancer cell apoptosis. Laser irradiation (635nm) of fucoidan/alginate-polyethylene glycol-gellan gum (Fu/AL-PEG@GGH) hydrogel applied on circular full-thickness skin defect in mice improved fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition resulting in enhanced wound healing.46 Likewise, Fucoidan/alginate-based gellan gum loaded with carboxymethyl cellulose nanofibrils were also tested together with a 635nm fiber optic laser with comparable results.47 In a follow-up study, Shanmugapriya and his colleagues tried out the effects of using cellulosic materials loaded with nanoemulsion together with low-level laser therapy for skin cancer PDT. A stabilized nanoemulsion (NE) was made by adding Astaxanthin to α-tocopherol which was then incorporated into nanocrystals/cellulose nanofibrils (CNC/CNF). Their hypothesis was proven as astaxanthin acted as a photosensitizer capable of inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells while irradiation with 635nm laser stimulated certain factors for differentiation and proliferation in fibroblasts cells.48 These studies substantiate the utility of combining hydrogels with photodynamic therapy or photobiomodulation treatments.

Drugs/natural products and photobiomodulation

Diabetes is a serious metabolic disease that is often accompanied by pressure wounds that are slow to heal. This illness also contributes to the patient’s susceptibility to infections which could exacerbate wound conditions. Two studies have tried to address this need by examining the combined effects of metformin and PBM using 890nm laser irradiation.49,50 Both investigations found application the combination of intraperitoneal injection of metformin and subsequent PBM treatment on the wounds significantly improved the healing rates of full-thickness skin defects in type 2 diabetic rats. Asghari et al. primarily observed reduction of colony-forming units and improved biomechanical properties of the wound bed treated with PBM and metformin.50 On the other hand Bagheri et al. noted better formation of granulation tissue and increased vascularization in PBM+metformin treatments. He also observed that lone treatments of PBM reduced M2 macrophage while metformin alone increased M2 macrophage. Even so, the data proved that both treatments acted synergistically to improve wound healing in non-genetic diabetic rats.49 In a separate study, co-enzyme Q10 was also tested out together with 904 super-pulsed laser as topical treatments for full-thickness burns in rats. Coenzyme q, also known as ubiquinone is a naturally occurring fat-soluble antioxidant in bacteria and animals.51-54 Yadav et al. found that the dual treatment showed synergism which promoted mitogenesis, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and wound closure.55 Aside from experiments involving known pharmacochemical agents, PBM has also been recently coupled with naturally derived products. Curcumin, the main natural polyphenol found in the rhizome of turmeric plants,56,57 has been also administered with infrared laser (890nm) on tensiometrical wounds in diabetic rats. Data provided by the experiments conducted by Soleimani et al. indicated comparable antibacterial effect and mildly improved biomechanical properties in the early stages leading to accelerated wound healing.58 Last but not the least, medicinal honey was also tested out together with 904nm super pulsed for a similar purpose by the same group who tested PBM with coenzyme Q10. Their finding revealed that the combined treatment resulted in better wound contraction and increased hexosamine, a vital component for extracellular matrix stabilization in the regenerated tissue. The synergistic activity of the medicinal honey and laser irradiation also resulted in: reduced pain and inflammation; decreased expression of COX-2, TNF-α, substance-P receptor, NF-κB, and IL-1β; and fibronectin up-regulation, enhanced cell migration, adhesion. All these observations led to considerable advantage in terms of healing dermal wounds.

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Although several decades of investigations have been conducted to elicit mechanisms for regenerative property and establish therapeutic approaches for the application of PDT and PBM, there are still significant gaps and conflicting claims about the utility of these alternative techniques. The current trend in research indicates that photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapy using lasers and LED is here to stay. The current evidence appears to support the idea that phototherapy is not dependent on sole coherence and high energy output but also on selective wavelength application, optimized absorption, and photo-activation to yield desirable physiological effects. The notable combined photodynamic/photobiomodulation therapies discussed above are a testament to the uncharted potential application of light energy in the field of regenerative medicine. As more and more drugs and biomaterials become available, phototherapy would eventually be incorporated in more advanced and effective dermal wound management procedures.

THERAPEUTICS COMBINED WITH PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY/PHOTOBIOMODULATION

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy

As mentioned earlier, disinfection is among the most common application of light energy in the medical field. The use of UV and blue light as germicidal agents have been around since 1870s.26 Recent investigations have now focused on advancing the use of the antimicrobial effect of light through PDT application. A recent study conducted by Petrini et al. attempted to verify the potential of using NIR LED and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for long-term inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).27 Although the combined treatment did not result in total inactivation of E. faecalis, their results indicated that the combination of NaOCl and NIR LED irradiation achieved consistently higher photoinactivation for 1 week compared to either LED or NaOCl alone. In a separate study, full-thickness wounds infected with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were treated with a photosensitive agent -Indocyanine Green and irradiated with a diode laser with an 810nm wavelength. Bacterial colonization of S. aureus significantly decreased on infected wounds and improved wound healing after treatment indicating the synergistic effect of the NIR laser photobiomodulation and the photodynamic effect of indocyanine activation on the bacterial load.28 A similar antimicrobial effect was also observed by Wong et al. when using a commercial NIR lamp that outputs non-coherent light to induce antimicrobial PDT on methicillin-resistant S. Waaureus (MRSA).29 Another study also noted the importance of accumulating the proper photosensitizer and targeting the optimal absorption peak for the endogenous photosensitization of gram-positive bacteria. In a study conducted by Walter et al., coproporphyrin III was targeted to induce antimicrobial PDT in gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) through the addition of aminolevulinic acid and small molecule VU0038882, or both. Their results showed that targeting specific molecules required optimization for peak absorption and subsequent endogenous photosensitization.30 The use of different LED wavelengths and multiple light sources for simultaneous PDT and PBM also yielded better results compared to monochromatic settings which will be discussed in the latter section of this article.

Photobiomodulation for toxins

Another more novel application of light energy in the medical field is its utilization as adjuvant therapy after serum therapy following exposure to toxic agents such as snake venom. Several studies have been recently published tackling the positive effects of PBM on tissue exposed to animal poison. Subsequent investigations performed by Pereira Dos Reis et al.31 revealed that LED irradiation (945nm) induced positive effects such as increased mitochondrial metabolism, reduced cytotoxicity, decrease in reactive oxygen species, and nitrogen liberation in activated murine macrophages exposed to bothropstoxin-I (BthTX-I) or bothropstoxin-I (BthTX-II) from Bothrops jararacussu (B. jararacussu) venom.32 Two wavelengths (635 nm and 945 nm) were also tested out using LED to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation on the local pathological effects of Bothrops asper (B. asper).33 The results of the experiments conducted on mice showed that both red and infrared wavelengths reduced edema, inflammatory infiltrate, and myotoxicity warranting further investigation of using PBM for treating local effects of snake bites. Lasers have also been applied for the PBM treatment of snake venom. In a study conducted by Lauria et al, the application of laser treatment (780 or 660 nm) after Bothrops lecurus venom injection in mice effectively reduced edema formation and delayed myotoxicity. PBM has been found to be a suitable complement to antivenom treatment.34 Further study on snake venom demonstrated that PBM was capable of protecting muscle cells from damage and attenuating the inflammatory effects brought about by BthTX-I.35

Dual wavelength PDT-PBM

Having established the utility of light energy as an antimicrobial agent and a stimulant for cell growth and tissue development, several studies have tried to investigate the effects of simultaneous irradiation using two wavelengths. A clinical study conducted by Baracho et al. revealed that several sessions of combined 630 nm and 940 nm LED irradiation successfully enhanced the healing of pressure-induced injuries in patients.36 In another study also involving pressure injury, photobiomodulation was carried out using a combined 660 nm + 810 nm continuous laser. Pressure wounds infected with Pantoea agglomerans were irradiated using this dual simultaneous emitting laser for 14 sessions at 142.8 J/cm2. Results revealed that the irradiated infected wounds developed thinner neo-epidermis, lowered IL-10, and increased IL-1β expression. Thomé Lima, A.M.C. and his group concluded that the dual-wavelength laser improved pressure wound healing by eradicating bioburden and stimulating cells for repair.37 The stimulatory effect of dual-wavelength lasers (630 + 810) has also been recently tested on human-sourced adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs). The dual-wavelength treatment resulted in boosted cell viability and population doubling time of both cell types which could potentially be proven useful for cell maintenance and expansion or procedures involving the cell therapy for dermal wound regeneration.38

Hydrogels and PBM/PDT

Another emerging approach with regards to combining dermal wound management methods is the inclusion of routine irradiation in conjunction with the application of hydrogel biomaterials. Bacterial cellulose membrane has garnered much attention in recent years and has been used in a wide array of biomedical applications, particularly for skin tissue.39-42 One fairly recent publication by Brassolatti et al. and Vasconcellos et al. showed that even though the lone application of either photobiomodulation (660 nm) or bacterial nanocellulose membrane resulted in improved healing in second-degree and third-degree burn animal models, combining these two treatments compromised the development of blood vessels and collagen deposition crucial for the reparative phase of wound healing.43,44 This is in contrast to the following studies which involved hydrogels designed for PDT together which PBM. A study conducted by He et al. aimed at investigating the efficacy of using red light on a PDT-based material to simultaneously perform PBM and antibacterial activity.45 For their experiment, they fabricated a catechol motif-modified methacrylated gelatin with mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles loaded with Chlorin e6 photosensitizer (GelMAc/MPDA@Ce6) which can be used as a wound dressing or coating for other materials. Antibacterial activity was initiated by laser irradiation at 1W cm-2 while PBM stimulation of fibroblasts was achieved with daily irradiation at 100 w cm-2. Their data suggested that both PDT and PBM can be subsequently performed by adjusting irradiation parameters of the hydrogel applied on the wound surface.45 A series of recently published studies by Shanmugapriya et al. showcased the potential of both alginate-based and cellulose-based hydrogels together with laser therapy for wound healing and induction of cancer cell apoptosis. Laser irradiation (635nm) of fucoidan/alginate-polyethylene glycol-gellan gum (Fu/AL-PEG@GGH) hydrogel applied on circular full-thickness skin defect in mice improved fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition resulting in enhanced wound healing.46 Likewise, Fucoidan/alginate-based gellan gum loaded with carboxymethyl cellulose nanofibrils were also tested together with a 635nm fiber optic laser with comparable results.47 In a follow-up study, Shanmugapriya and his colleagues tried out the effects of using cellulosic materials loaded with nanoemulsion together with low-level laser therapy for skin cancer PDT. A stabilized nanoemulsion (NE) was made by adding Astaxanthin to α-tocopherol which was then incorporated into nanocrystals/cellulose nanofibrils (CNC/CNF). Their hypothesis was proven as astaxanthin acted as a photosensitizer capable of inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells while irradiation with 635nm laser stimulated certain factors for differentiation and proliferation in fibroblasts cells.48 These studies substantiate the utility of combining hydrogels with photodynamic therapy or photobiomodulation treatments.

Drugs/natural products and photobiomodulation

Diabetes is a serious metabolic disease that is often accompanied by pressure wounds that are slow to heal. This illness also contributes to the patient’s susceptibility to infections which could exacerbate wound conditions. Two studies have tried to address this need by examining the combined effects of metformin and PBM using 890nm laser irradiation.49,50 Both investigations found application the combination of intraperitoneal injection of metformin and subsequent PBM treatment on the wounds significantly improved the healing rates of full-thickness skin defects in type 2 diabetic rats. Asghari et al. primarily observed reduction of colony-forming units and improved biomechanical properties of the wound bed treated with PBM and metformin.50 On the other hand Bagheri et al. noted better formation of granulation tissue and increased vascularization in PBM+metformin treatments. He also observed that lone treatments of PBM reduced M2 macrophage while metformin alone increased M2 macrophage. Even so, the data proved that both treatments acted synergistically to improve wound healing in non-genetic diabetic rats.49 In a separate study, co-enzyme Q10 was also tested out together with 904 super-pulsed laser as topical treatments for full-thickness burns in rats. Coenzyme q, also known as ubiquinone is a naturally occurring fat-soluble antioxidant in bacteria and animals.51-54 Yadav et al. found that the dual treatment showed synergism which promoted mitogenesis, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and wound closure.55 Aside from experiments involving known pharmacochemical agents, PBM has also been recently coupled with naturally derived products. Curcumin, the main natural polyphenol found in the rhizome of turmeric plants,56,57 has been also administered with infrared laser (890nm) on tensiometrical wounds in diabetic rats. Data provided by the experiments conducted by Soleimani et al. indicated comparable antibacterial effect and mildly improved biomechanical properties in the early stages leading to accelerated wound healing.58 Last but not the least, medicinal honey was also tested out together with 904nm super pulsed for a similar purpose by the same group who tested PBM with coenzyme Q10. Their finding revealed that the combined treatment resulted in better wound contraction and increased hexosamine, a vital component for extracellular matrix stabilization in the regenerated tissue. The synergistic activity of the medicinal honey and laser irradiation also resulted in: reduced pain and inflammation; decreased expression of COX-2, TNF-α, substance-P receptor, NF-κB, and IL-1β; and fibronectin up-regulation, enhanced cell migration, adhesion. All these observations led to considerable advantage in terms of healing dermal wounds.

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Although several decades of investigations have been conducted to elicit mechanisms for regenerative property and establish therapeutic approaches for the application of PDT and PBM, there are still significant gaps and conflicting claims about the utility of these alternative techniques. The current trend in research indicates that photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapy using lasers and LED is here to stay. The current evidence appears to support the idea that phototherapy is not dependent on sole coherence and high energy output but also on selective wavelength application, optimized absorption, and photo-activation to yield desirable physiological effects. The notable combined photodynamic/photobiomodulation therapies discussed above are a testament to the uncharted potential application of light energy in the field of regenerative medicine. As more and more drugs and biomaterials become available, phototherapy would eventually be incorporated in more advanced and effective dermal wound management procedures.

FUNDING
None.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Andrew Padalhin is an editorial board member of the journal but was not involved in the review process of this manuscript. Otherwise, there is no conflict of interest to declare.
References
  1. Grzybowski A, Sak J, Pawlikowski J. A brief report on the history of phototherapy. Clin Dermatol 2016;34:532-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Hönigsmann H. History of phototherapy in dermatology. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2013;12:16-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Barolet D, Christiaens F, Hamblin MR. Infrared and skin: friend or foe. J Photochem Photobiol B 2016;155:78-85.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Murray CK, Hamblin MR, Hooper DC, et al. Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of pathogenic microbes: state of the art. Drug Resist Updat 2017;33-35:1-22.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Ferrer-Espada R, Liu X, Goh XS, Dai T. Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of polymicrobial biofilms. Front Microbiol 2019;10:721.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Leanse LG, Dos Anjos C, Mushtaq S, Dai T. Antimicrobial blue light: a 'Magic Bullet' for the 21st century and beyond? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022;180:114057.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Dai T, Garcia B, Murray CK, Vrahas MS, Hamblin MR. UVC light prophylaxis for cutaneous wound infections in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:3841-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Gupta A, Avci P, Dai T, Huang YY, Hamblin MR. Ultraviolet radiation in wound care: sterilization and stimulation. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2013;2:422-37.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Daniell MD, Hill JS. A history of photodynamic therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 1991;61:340-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Kessel D. Photodynamic therapy: a brief history. J Clin Med 2019;8:1581.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Szeimies RM, Dräger J, Abels C, Landthaler M. History of photodynamic therapy in dermatology. In: Calzavara-Pinton P, Szeimies RM, Ortel B, editors, Comprehensive Series in Photosciences. Elsevier; 2001. p. 3-15.
    CrossRef
  12. Kato H. [History of photodynamic therapy--past, present and future]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1996;23:8-15. Japanese.
    Pubmed
  13. Aroso RT, Schaberle FA, Arnaut LG, Pereira MM. Photodynamic disinfection and its role in controlling infectious diseases. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2021;20:1497-545.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Zhu S, Song Y, Pei J, Xue F, Cui X, Xiong X, et al. The application of photodynamic inactivation to microorganisms in food. Food Chem X 2021;12:100150.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Chung PS, Ahn JC, Lee SJ, Peijie HE, Moon JH. Effect of photodynamic therapy in melanoma skin cancer cell line A375: in vivo study. Med Laser 2014;3:27-30.
    CrossRef
  16. Kim JY, Park ES. Successful treatment of foreign body granuloma using topical photodynamic therapy. Med Laser 2014;3:35-8.
    CrossRef
  17. Chang HS, Lim NK. Clinical applications of a non-ablative fractional dual laser (1550/1927 nm). Med Laser 2020;9:110-8.
    CrossRef
  18. Mester A, Mester A. The history of photobiomodulation: Endre Mester (1903-1984). Photomed Laser Surg 2017;35:393-94.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Houreld NN. The use of lasers and light sources in skin rejuvenation. Clin Dermatol 2019;37:358-64.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Heiskanen V, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation: lasers vs. light emitting diodes? Photochem Photobiol Sci 2018;17:1003-17. Erratum in: Photochem Photobiol Sci 2018;18:259.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Lamaro-Cardoso A, Bachion MM, Morais JM, Fantinati MS, Milhomem AC, Almeida VL, et al. Photobiomodulation associated to cellular therapy improve wound healing of experimental full thickness burn wounds in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B 2019;194:174-82.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Medrado AP, Soares AP, Santos ET, Reis SR, Andrade ZA. Influence of laser photobiomodulation upon connective tissue remodeling during wound healing. J Photochem Photobiol B 2008;92:144-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Otterço AN, Andrade AL, Brassolatti P, Pinto KNZ, Araújo HSS, Parizotto NA. Photobiomodulation mechanisms in the kinetics of the wound healing process in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B 2018;183:22-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Kang JW, Ryu HS, Abueva C, Chung PS, Woo SH. Stability and effectiveness of laser and Liquiband treatments in the rat model of oral ulcer. Med Laser 2021;10:207-13.
    CrossRef
  25. Rhee YH, Cho KJ, Ahn JC, Chung PS. Effect of photobiomodulation on wound healing of the corneal epithelium through Rho-GTPase. Med Laser 2017;6:67-76.
    CrossRef
  26. Enwemeka CS, Baker TL, Bumah VV. The role of UV and blue light in photo-eradication of microorganisms. J Photochem Photobiol 2021;8:100064.
    CrossRef
  27. Petrini M, Spoto G, Scarano A, D'Arcangelo C, Tripodi D, Di Fermo P, et al. Near-infrared LEDS provide persistent and increasing protection against E. faecalis. J Photochem Photobiol B 2019;197:111527.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Torabi S, Joharchi K, Kalhori KAM, Sohrabi M, Fekrazad R. Evaluation of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on wounds infected by Staphylococcus aureus in animal models. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2021;33:102092.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Wong TW, Wu EC, Ko WC, Lee CC, Hor LI, Huang IH, et al. Photodynamic inactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by indocyanine green and near infrared light. Dermatol Sin 2018;36:8-15.
    CrossRef
  30. Walter AB, Simpson J, Jenkins JL, Skaar EP, Jansen ED. Optimization of optical parameters for improved photodynamic therapy of Staphylococcus aureus using endogenous coproporphyrin III. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2020;29:101624.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Pereira Dos Reis V, Macedo Tavares MN, Alves Rego CM, Ferreira E, Ferreira AA, da Silva Setubal S, Soares AM, et al. Light emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation therapy on murine macrophage exposed to Bothropstoxin-I and Bothropstoxin-II myotoxins. Toxicon 2019;172:45-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Reis VP, Rego CMA, Setúbal SS, Tavares MNM, Boeno CN, et al; Ferreira E Ferreira AA. Effect of light emitting diode photobiomodulation on murine macrophage function after Bothrops envenomation. Chem Biol Interact 2021;333:109347.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Campos GRS, de Moura KMB, Barbosa AM, Zamuner LF, Nadur-Andrade N, Dale CS, et al. Light emitting diode (LED) therapy reduces local pathological changes induced by Bothrops asper snake venom. Toxicon 2018;152:95-102.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Lauria PSS, Maia-Marques R, Oliveira R, Nunes VLC, Casais-E-Silva LL. Effects of photobiomodulation therapy on the local experimental envenoming by Bothrops leucurus snake. J Photochem Photobiol B 2021;214:112087.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Santos ASD, Guimarães-Sousa L, Costa MS, Zamuner LF, Sousa NC, Hyslop S, et al. Photobiomodulation of local alterations induced by BthTX-I, a phospholipase A2 myotoxin from Bothrops jararacussu snake venom: In vivo and in vitro evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;107(Pt B):2020-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Baracho VDS, Chaves MEA, Huebner R, Oliveira MX, Ferreira PHDC, Lucas TC. Phototherapy (cluster multi-diode 630 nm and 940 nm) on the healing of pressure injury: a pilot study. J Vasc Nurs 2021;39:67-75.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Thomé Lima AMC, da Silva Sergio LP, da Silva Neto Trajano LA, de Souza BP, da Motta Mendes JP, Cardoso AFR, et al. Photobiomodulation by dual-wavelength low-power laser effects on infected pressure ulcers. Lasers Med Sci 2020;35:651-60. Erratum in: Lasers Med Sci 2020;35:661.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Zare F, Moradi A, Fallahnezhad S, Ghoreishi SK, Amini A, Chien S, et al. Photobiomodulation with 630 plus 810 nm wavelengths induce more in vitro cell viability of human adipose stem cells than human bone marrow-derived stem cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 2019;201:111658.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Zheng L, Li S, Luo J, Wang X. Latest advances on bacterial cellulose-based antibacterial materials as wound dressings. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:593768.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Loh EYX, Mohamad N, Fauzi MB, Ng MH, Ng SF, Mohd Amin MCI. Development of a bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel cell carrier containing keratinocytes and fibroblasts for full-thickness wound healing. Sci Rep 2018;8:2875.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Moradpoor H, Mohammadi H, Safaei M, Mozaffari HR, Sharifi R, Gorji P, et al. Recent advances on bacterial cellulose-based wound management: promises and challenges. Int J Polym Sci 2022;2022:1214734.
    CrossRef
  42. Cherng JH, Chou SC, Chen CL, Wang YW, Chang SJ, Fan GY, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential bio-scaffold for effective re-epithelialization therapy. Pharmaceutics 2021;13:1592.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Brassolatti P, Bossini PS, Kido HW, Derencio Oliveira MC, Almeida-Lopes L, Zanardi LM, et al. Photobiomodulation and bacterial cellulose membrane in the treatment of third-degree burns in rats. J Tissue Viability 2018;27:249-56.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Vasconcellos PKFM, Nóia MP, De Castro ICV, Dos Santos JN, Pinheiro ALB, Marques AMC, et al. Influence of laser therapy on the dynamic formation of extracellular matrix in standard second degree burns treated with bacterial cellulose membrane. J Photochem Photobiol B 2018;182:1-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. He Y, Leng J, Li K, Xu K, Lin C, Yuan Z, et al. A multifunctional hydrogel coating to direct fibroblast activation and infected wound healing via simultaneously controllable photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapies. Biomaterials 2021;278:121164.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Shanmugapriya K, Kim H, Lee YW, Kang HW. Multifunctional heteropolysaccharide hydrogel under photobiomodulation for accelerated wound regeneration. Ceram Int 2020;46:7268-78.
    CrossRef
  47. Shanmugapriya K, Kim H, Kang HW. Fucoidan-loaded hydrogels facilitates wound healing using photodynamic therapy by in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Carbohydr Polym 2020;247:116624.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Shanmugapriya K, Kim H, Lee YW, Kang HW. Cellulose nanocrystals/nanofibrils loaded astaxanthin nanoemulsion for the induction of apoptosis via ROS-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer cells under photobiomodulation. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;149:165-77.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Bagheri M, Mostafavinia A, Abdollahifar MA, Amini A, Ghoreishi SK, Chien S, et al. Combined effects of metformin and photobiomodulation improve the proliferation phase of wound healing in type 2 diabetic rats. Biomed Pharmacother 2020;123:109776.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Asghari M, Kanonisabet A, Safakhah M, Azimzadeh Z, Mostafavinia A, Taheri S, et al. The effect of combined photobiomodulation and metformin on open skin wound healing in a non-genetic model of type II diabetes. J Photochem Photobiol B 2017;169:63-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Marashi SM, Majidi M, Sadeghian M, Jafarzadeh M, Mohammadi S, Nasri-Nasrabadi Z, et al. Protective role of coenzyme Q10 as a means of alleviating the toxicity of aluminum phosphide: an evidence-based review. Tzu Chi Med J 2015;27:7-9.
    CrossRef
  52. Littarru GP, Tiano L. Clinical aspects of coenzyme Q10: an update. Nutrition 2010;26:250-4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Casagrande D, Waib PH, Jordão Júnior AA. Mechanisms of action and effects of the administration of Coenzyme Q10 on metabolic syndrome. J Nutr Intermed Metab 2018;13:26-32.
    CrossRef
  54. Aaseth J, Alexander J, Alehagen U. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation- in ageing and disease. Mech Ageing Dev 2021;197:111521.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Yadav A, Priyadarshi A, Keshri GK, Verma S, Gupta A. Superpulsed 904 nm laser photobiomodulation combined with coenzyme Q10 synergistically augment burn wound healing. J Photochem Photobiol 2021;7:100053.
    CrossRef
  56. Hewlings SJ, Kalman DS. Curcumin: a review of its effects on human health. Foods 2017;6:92.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Fadus MC, Lau C, Bikhchandani J, Lynch HT. Curcumin: an age-old anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplastic agent. J Tradit Complement Med 2016;7:339-46.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Soleimani H, Amini A, Taheri S, Sajadi E, Shafikhani S, Schuger LA, et al. The effect of combined photobiomodulation and curcumin on skin wound healing in type I diabetes in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B 2018;181:23-30.
    Pubmed CrossRef


This Article


Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)
  • Download (385)

Author ORCID Information

Services

Social Network Service

e-submission

Archives