Med Lasers 2022; 11(1): 15-20
Photobiomodulation Therapy in the Treatment of Salivary Dysfunction
Celine Abueva
Beckman Laser Institute Korea, Cheonan, Korea
Correspondence to: Celine Abueva
Received: March 12, 2022; Accepted: March 15, 2022; Published online: March 30, 2022.
© Korean Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Photobiomodulation therapy, owing to its photobiological anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects, has been suggested as a non-invasive, safe, and effective approach in treating salivary dysfunctions. Xerostomia or dry mouth and hyposalivation are challenging conditions, and patients suffer oral problems and a poor quality of life. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of photobiomodulation in reducing xerostomia and hyposalivation. However, there is a lack of synthesis of available evidence to establish whether it is an efficient, safe, and cost-effective method. In addition, the challenges include the lack of consensus on the optimal PBM dosage, as well as the variability of the findings in published studies.
Keywords: Xerostomia; Dry mouth; Hyposalivation; Photobiomodulation; Low level laser therapy

Saliva is essential in oral homeostasis and health. On average, a human produces 0.5-1.5 liters of saliva daily.1,2 Majority of the saliva comes from pairs of the parotid, submandibular, and sublingual salivary glands, with some coming from numerous minor salivary glands distributed in the oral mucosa.3 Saliva, as the first digestive fluid in the alimentary canal, assist in food intake and digestion of starch and lipids by acting as a solvent. Saliva also plays a crucial role in taste receptor and oral mucosa hydration and maintenance and teeth protection. Furthermore, saliva controls oral microflora with its antimicrobial properties and mechanical cleansing action. Thus, the loss of salivary function can have serious consequences.

Salivary dysfunctions associated with xerostomia or dry mouth (absence of saliva flow) and hyposalivation (reduced saliva flow) can contribute to both minor and severe health problems such as nutrition and dental and psychological health. Other problems caused by xerostomia include a constant sore throat, taste alteration, burning sensation in the mouth, and difficulty in speaking and swallowing. Salivary dysfunction left untreated can significantly affect the quality of life. The common causes of saliva dysfunction are (1) medications such as antihistamines, anticholinergics, diuretics, and sedatives,4,5 (2) diseases such as Sjögren’s syndrome,6 and (3) cancer therapy including high doses of radiation to the head and neck.7 The evaluation of saliva dysfunction is performed through questionnaires or instruments to analyze and grade aspects related to taste, chewing, swallowing, speech, sleep, and quality of life. A consensus has not been reached on the definition of low salivary flow, and the definitive relationship between hyposalivation and xerostomia remain unknown. In some cases, people who suffer from dry mouth may have normal or even high salivary flow. However, xerostomia and hyposalivation prevalence is significant and conditions in terms of management can be challenging.

Treatment approaches in salivary dysfunction include patient education on basic oral hygiene, avoiding certain types of food such as acidic and spicy foods, and stopping smoking and alcohol intake. Other treatments include sugar-free chewing gums or toothpaste, mouthwashes that help stimulate and improve saliva secretion, and symptomatic relief.8 Pilocarpine and cevimeline systemic saliva stimulants have also been prescribed, but with many reported side effects.9 Thus, non-pharmacological methods have been studied and developed with varied success, such as acupuncture,10 electrostimulation,9 and low-level laser therapy (LLLT).11,12 This review focuses on the studies that have been conducted using LLLT, also known as photobiomodulation therapy, in salivary dysfunction (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Scheme showing cause and effect of xerostomia or dry mouth, and photobiomodulation as a treatment option discussed in this review. Created with

Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy uses low-power light to irradiate tissue typically ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 W of power to exclude potential heat effects.13 The mechanisms involved in PBM treatment are still not well understood. However, the main idea is that photons are absorbed by the target tissue converting it into useful energy that enhances the metabolic processes in the cell, such as increasing ATP production and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.14,15 PBM delivers photons on the cell mitochondria. Then photon energy is absorbed by cytochrome C oxidase (Cox), the last enzyme of the electron transportation chain that mediates electron transfer from the cytochrome c towards molecular oxygenation, consequently increasing ATP production and ROS concentration.16 Accelerated oxygenation and ATP production promote the regeneration of damaged cells and tissue.17,18

The potential treatment effects and mode of action of PBM in salivary function have been elucidated previously in animal studies. A study measuring saliva flow rate in diabetic mice after PBM treatment suggested a beneficial effect.19 A study using a guinea pig animal model suggested that PBM could delay necrotic histological changes in the submandibular gland.20 PBM has also been reported to prevent apoptosis and inflammation in diabetic rats. In addition, antioxidant effects and functional salivary enzyme activities were found for normal rats and diabetic rats.21 However, varying observations and conclusions were derived depending on the different protocols, light treatment parameters, and systemic conditions in the animals. Light parameters such as irradiance, power, energy, exposure time, and wavelength can be adjusted to modulate results.

The advantages of PBM that are known thus far include improved epithelial cell mitosis, increase in salivary ducts, and stimulation of protein synthesis in submandibular glands. Others report increase in anti-apoptotic protein expressions and intracellular calcium levels, and blood circulation in the salivary glands that lead to regeneration of salivary glands and improved functionality.


Radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer uses ionizing radiation to treat malignant neoplasms. Radiation for head and neck tumors typically distributed at the tumor site ranges between 50 and 70 Gy in total with a daily dose of 1.8-2.0 Gy. The mechanism involves direct damage on DNA structure or through the production of free radicals that disrupt the DNA integrity of proliferative cells. Salivary gland cells have low turnover but are highly sensitive to radiotherapy. Damage to membrane receptors, disruption in cytoplasmic granules, and changes in the levels of aquaporins have been reported as some possible mechanisms of salivary dysfunction induced by radiotherapy.22,23 It has also been reported that the activation of p53 transcription due to DNA damage has a crucial role in salivary acinar cell radiosensitivity. The mechanisms of radiation-induced damage to salivary function remain uncertain, but atrophy and acinar degeneration are often found histologically. In a study, the accumulation of the p53 protein due to radiation was found to activate the up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) target genes with a pro-apoptotic effect.24 The radiotherapy treatment areas are typically within the range of the salivary glands. Thus, patient develops hyposalivation and xerostomia. About 80-93 % of patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy develop some degree of xerostomia.25 Patients often complain of difficulty in oral lubrication, dysgeusia, and burning sensation. The risk of oral infections is also high due to the low amounts of enzymes and immunoglobulins present in the oral mucosa. Patients have also reported worsening quality of life attributed to radiation-induced hyposalivation.

At present, there is no effective treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia and hyposalivation. However, some alternatives that give relief, such as muscarinic agonists and amifostine, have demonstrated beneficial results to address xerostomia and hyposalivation but with side effects. Hence, the development of new treatments. Among the new treatments that have been studied is laser PBM. PBM has gained prominence because it is a safe and painless method that patients well accept. Clinical studies describe improvements in salivary function with laser treatment ranging from approximately 600-850 nm (Table 1).26-30

Table 1 . Clinical studies of photobiomodulation effects on radiotherapy-induced salivary dysfunction

CaseTreatment parametersTarget areaResultsYearref
XerostomiaLaser (InGaAl, 660 & 810 nm, 40 mW, 10 & 25 J/cm2); 15 sessionsIntra- and extra-oral applications over salivary glandsNo difference between groups was noted in relation to salivary flow and composition, xerostomia or quality of life202026
XerostomiaLaser (InGaAlP, 808 nm, 30 mW, 7.5 J/cm2); 24 sessionsMajor salivary glandsLow-level laser therapy improved salivary hypofunction and increase salivary pH of patients leading to an improvement in quality of life201727
XerostomiaLaser (He-Ne, 630 nm, 30 mW, 5.16-16.2 J/cm2); 24 sessionsExtra-oral applications in parotid and submandibular glandReduced incidence of oral mucositis lesions, oral pain, and xerostomia201728
HyposalivationLaser (InGaAlP, 660/ 780 nm, 40/15 mW, 10/3.8 J/cm2); 21 sessionsIntra- and extra-oral applicationsHigher salivary flow rate201629
HyposalivationLaser (InGaAlP, 685 nm, 35 mW, 2 J/cm2); 21 sessionsIntra-oral application avoiding tumor siteLower degress of oral mucositis, pain and higher salivary flow201330

In most cases, treatment is performed intra- or extra-orally in the buccal mucosa, tongue, and main salivary glands. Reports describe pain relief, improvement in salivary flow, and reduced dry mouth relative to sham or control groups. However, a few studies also report no distinguishable effects after laser treatment. The reason may depend on the cell destruction level caused by radiotherapy, especially on the major salivary glands. Nevertheless, xerostomia and hyposalivation consequently the quality of life seem to be improved with PBM treatment compared to being left untreated for patients undergoing radiotherapy. More comprehensive studies may be needed to understand better the mechanisms involved and how PBM treatment can be improved for salivary dysfunction induced by radiotherapy.


There is a lack of literature pertaining on the impact of PBM in patients with xerostomia or hyposalivation induced by drugs. Majority of the papers deal with xerostomia related to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, several drugs have been linked with salivary dysfunction as a side effect. Some diuretics are responsible for decreasing the amount of circulating intravascular and extracellular fluid in the body, including saliva, whereas anticholinergic drugs act directly on the hypothalamus, reducing salivary production. Drugs used to treat chronic diseases such as anticholinergics and β blockers are also known to influence the quantity and quality of saliva production directly.

A study on photobiomodulation effects in salivary production in patients with drug-induced hyposalivation describes PBM treatment’s ability to increase unstimulated salivary flow rate (Table 2).31-35 However, the mechanism was not explained well in the study.

Table 2 . Other clinical studies of photobiomodulation treatments in salivary glands

CaseTreatment parametersTarget areaResultsYearref
SclerodermaLaser (InGaAl, 660 & 808 nm, 100 mW, 0.8 J/cm2); 6 sessionsSublingual, parotid and submandibular glandsIncrease in salivary flow, remission of the xerostomia, and an improvement in mastication and swallowing202131
Drug-induced xerostomiaLaser (GaAlAs, 830 nm, 35 mW, 1.60 J/cm2); 14 sessionsParotid, submandibular, and sublingual glandsIncreased salivary flow rate201632
Burning mouth syndromeLaser (InGaAl, 660-970 nm, 3.2 W, frequency 1-20000Hz, spot size 1 cm2); 10 sessionsOral cavitySignificant decrease in symptoms related to the burning mouth201933
Burning mouth syndromeLaser (InGaAl, 685 vs 830 nm, 30 mW, 3 J/cm2); 4 sessionsAreas affected by burning sensation w/ laser fiber tip in contact w/ mucosaCombination laser therapy & alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) was efficient in reducing burning mouth symptoms, with LLLT being more efficient than ALA201834
Sjögren's syndromeLaser (AlGaAs, 808 nm, 100 mW, 133 J/cm2); 12 sessionsSublingual glandsLLLT protocol used in this study affected no improvement in xerostomia or salivary flow rate201735

Several other studies of PBM performed in the salivary glands can be found in the literature (Table 2). However, clinical reports were found to have low sampling or patients that meet set criteria for each study. There is also a difference in the observation periods and validation method, which makes PBM treatment establishment difficult clinically.


Salivary gland dysfunction is clinically relevant, and decreased salivary flow rate may cause chronic oral discomfort. As a result, the patient’s well-being and oral health-related quality of life are impaired. Despite considerable research over many years, little progress has been made in developing strategies to prevent severe xerostomia or hyposalivation. Existing studies indicate that photobiomodulation therapy can manage xerostomia and hyposalivation. However, a lack of standards in reporting light treatment parameters makes reproducing the results challenging. More comprehensive studies with standardized reporting of treatment protocols are needed.



Celine Abueva is an editorial board member of the journal but was not involved in the review process of this manuscript. Otherwise, there is no conflict of interest to declare.
  1. Iorgulescu G. Saliva between normal and pathological. Important factors in determining systemic and oral health. J Med Life 2009;2:303-7.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  2. Islas-Granillo H, Borges-Yáñez A, Fernández-Barrera MÁ, Ávila-Burgos L, Patiño-Marín N, Márquez-Corona ML, et al. Relationship of hyposalivation and xerostomia in Mexican elderly with socioeconomic, sociodemographic and dental factors. Sci Rep 2017;7:40686.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Mese H, Matsuo R. Salivary secretion, taste and hyposalivation. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:711-23.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Ship JA, Pillemer SR, Baum BJ. Xerostomia and the geriatric patient. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:535-43.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Millsop JW, Wang EA, Fazel N. Etiology, evaluation, and management of xerostomia. Clin Dermatol 2017;35:468-76.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Cassolato SF, Turnbull RS. Xerostomia: clinical aspects and treatment. Gerodontology 2003;20:64-77.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Dirix P, Nuyts S, Van den Bogaert W. Radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer: a literature review. Cancer 2006;107:2525-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Tanasiewicz M, Hildebrandt T, Obersztyn I. Xerostomia of various etiologies: a review of the literature. Adv Clin Exp Med 2016;25:199-206.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Farag AM, Holliday C, Cimmino J, Roomian T, Papas A. Comparing the effectiveness and adverse effects of pilocarpine and cevimeline in patients with hyposalivation. Oral Dis 2019;25:1937-44.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Al Hamad A, Lodi G, Porter S, Fedele S, Mercadante V. Interventions for dry mouth and hyposalivation in Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis 2019;25:1027-47.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Heiskanen V, Zadik Y, Elad S. Photobiomodulation therapy for cancer treatment-related salivary gland dysfunction: a systematic review. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2020;38:340-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Spanemberg JC, López López J, de Figueiredo MA, Cherubini K, Salum FG. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. J Biomed Opt 2015;20:098001.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Sousa AS, Silva JF, Pavesi VCS, Carvalho NA, Ribeiro-Júnior O, Varellis MLZ, et al. Photobiomodulation and salivary glands: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci 2020;35:777-88.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Ryu HS, Abueva C, Chung PS, Woo SH. Decade long survey of low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation (LLLT/PBM) therapy for oral mucositis treatment. Med Laser 2021;10:138-45.
  15. Rhee YH, Cho KJ, Ahn JC. Chung PS. Effect of photobiomodulation on wound healing of the corneal epithelium through Rho-GTPase. Med Laser 2017;6:67-76.
  16. Kang JW, Ryu HS, Abueva C, Chung PS, Woo SH. Stability and effectiveness of laser and liquiband treatments in the rat model of oral ulcer. Med Laser 2021;10:207-13.
  17. de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2016;22:7000417.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Calderhead RG. Photobiological basics of photomedicine: a work of art still in progress. Med Laser 2017;6:45-57.
  19. Biswas R, Ahn JC, Moon JH, Kim J, Choi YH, Park SY, et al. Low-level laser therapy with 850 nm recovers salivary function via membrane redistribution of aquaporin 5 by reducing intracellular Ca2+ overload and ER stress during hyperglycemia. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018;1862:1770-80.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Plavnik LM, De Crosa ME, Malberti AI. Effect of low-power radiation (helium/neon) upon submandibulary glands. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2003;21:219-25.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Fukuoka CY, Simões A, Uchiyama T, Arana-Chavez VE, Abiko Y, Kuboyama N, et al. The effects of low-power laser irradiation on inflammation and apoptosis in submandibular glands of diabetes-induced rats. PLoS One 2017;12:e0169443.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Louzeiro GC, Teixeira DDS, Cherubini K, de Figueiredo MAZ, Salum FG. Does laser photobiomodulation prevent hyposalivation in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020;156:103115.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Konings AW, Coppes RP, Vissink A. On the mechanism of salivary gland radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1187-94. Erratum in: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:330.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Avila JL, Grundmann O, Burd R, Limesand KH. Radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction results from p53-dependent apoptosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:523-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Jensen SB, Pedersen AM, Vissink A, Andersen E, Brown CG, Davies AN, et al. ; Salivary Gland Hypofunction/Xerostomia Section, Oral Care Study Group, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO). A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:1039-60.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Louzeiro GC, Cherubini K, de Figueiredo MAZ, Salum FG. Effect of photobiomodulation on salivary flow and composition, xerostomia and quality of life of patients during head and neck radiotherapy in short term follow-up: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Photochem Photobiol B 2020;209:111933.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Palma LF, Gonnelli FAS, Marcucci M, Dias RS, Giordani AJ, Segreto RA, et al. Impact of low-level laser therapy on hyposalivation, salivary pH, and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients post-radiotherapy. Lasers Med Sci 2017;32:827-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Libik TV, Gileva OS, Danilov KV, Grigorev SS, Pozdnyakova AA. Management of cancer therapy-induced oral mucositis pain and xerostomia with extra- and intra oral laser irradiation. AIP Conf Proc 2017;1882:020044.
  29. Gonnelli FA, Palma LF, Giordani AJ, Deboni AL, Dias RS, Segreto RA, et al. Low-level laser for mitigation of low salivary flow rate in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiochemotherapy: a prospective longitudinal study. Photomed Laser Surg 2016;34:326-30.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Oton-Leite AF, Elias LS, Morais MO, Pinezi JC, Leles CR, Silva MA, et al. Effect of low level laser therapy in the reduction of oral complications in patients with cancer of the head and neck submitted to radiotherapy. Spec Care Dentist 2013;33:294-300.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. de Oliveira AB, Ferrisse TM, Salomão KB, Miranda ML, Bufalino A, Brighenti FL. Photobiomodulation in the treatment of xerostomia associated with hyposalivation in a pediatric patient with systemic scleroderma. Autops Case Rep 2020;11:e2020220.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Terlević Dabić D, Jurišić S, Vučićević Boras V, Gabrić D, Bago I, Vrdoljak DV. The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in patients with drug-induced hyposalivation: a pilot study. Photomed Laser Surg 2016;34:389-93.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Bardellini E, Amadori F, Conti G, Majorana A. Efficacy of the photobiomodulation therapy in the treatment of the burning mouth syndrome. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019;24:e787-91.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Barbosa NG, Gonzaga AKG, de Sena Fernandes LL, da Fonseca AG, Queiroz SIML, Lemos TMAM, et al. Evaluation of laser therapy and alpha-lipoic acid for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 2018;33:1255-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Fidelix T, Czapkowski A, Azjen S, Andriolo A, Neto PH, Trevisani V. Low-level laser therapy for xerostomia in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a randomized trial. Clin Rheumatol 2018;37:729-36.
    Pubmed CrossRef

This Article

Cited By Articles

Author ORCID Information


Social Network Service