Med Laser 2022; 11(1): 47-52  https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2022.11.1.47
Effects of 45 Degree Knee Ballistic Movement on Exercise Volume, Performance Time and Muscle Activity during the Standing Barbell Shoulder Press Exercise
Ki Hong Kim1, Hwan Jong Jeong2, Hyeon Jib Kim3, Byung Kwan Kim2
1Department of Recreation and Leisure Sports, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea
2Sports Science Institute, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea
3Physical Education, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea
Correspondence to: Byung Kwan Kim
E-mail: kbk5581@naver.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-3998
Received: March 4, 2022; Accepted: March 12, 2022; Published online: March 30, 2022.
© Korean Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background and Objectives
The use of ballistic movements during resistance exercises can improve the efficiency of force and change the momentum and muscle activity due to the selective mobilization of the motor unit. This study was conducted to analyze the number of repetitions, exercise time, and body muscle activity during traditional resistance and ballistic resistance exercises.
Materials and Methods
Eight males in their 20s were selected as the study subjects and two exercise types (non-ballistic, ballistic) were performed. The following results were obtained by measuring the number of repetitions, exercise time, and the electromyography (EMG) response during exercise.
Results
First, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of repetitions with the ballistic movement during the standing shoulder press (p = .037). Second, there was a statistically significant difference in the exercise time with the ballistic movement during the standing shoulder press (p = .042). Third, there was a statistically significant difference in the erector spinae (p = .002), rectus femoris (p = .001), gastrocnemius (p = .012) activity with the ballistic movement during the standing shoulder press.
Conclusion
It was confirmed that muscle activity and power output could be changed with the use of ballistic movements.
Keywords: Standing shoulder press; Ballistic movement; Exercise volume; Muscle activity
INTRODUCTION

The shoulder press exercise, which lifts the barbell over the head during the resistance exercise, is widely used in the training, rehabilitation and sports field of athletes as a movement to train the muscle group around the shoulder.1 Especially, the shoulder press in the standing posture has the operation of lifting the barbell over the head, and the lumbar extensor for stabilizing the trunk is active by using deltoid muscle and triceps brachii as the prime mover.2

Also, shoulder press exercise using lower extremity and upper extremity at the same time is said to generate lower extremity force at a level similar to the operation using recoil like jump squat, and the operation of bending and unfolding the knee and hips provides efficient movement of lower extremity and upper extremity,3 which is reported to occur as the segment of lower extremity unfolds.4 The simultaneous force production of lower extremities in shoulder press motions can improve power, workload and potentially increase the activity of neuromusculars.5

Since muscle power is very important for improving athletic performance, various exercise methods performed by elastic movement are presented in sports sites.6 The most common methods are clean, snatch, and plyometric training. These exercises help players reach their target point at the force-velocity curve, and they need to train at 30-80% 1RM load strength to maximize Type II muscle fiber, which improves power.7

The ballistic movement, which exerts power at a rapid rate, generates a stretch-shortening cycle (SSC cycle) to exert explosive force, so that Type II muscle fiber can be selectively mobilized,8 contributing to the development of cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fiber, and increasing maximum muscle strength.9,10

This force is to operate the exercise unit voluntarily to lift the weight load as quickly as possible.11,12

In the previous study, it was reported that the mobilization of the high motor unit and the maximum firing rate speed were improved at the beginning of the exercise by analyzing the electromyography response before and after the 12-week fast contraction training.13

On the other hand, there is no study to investigate physical changes during exercise,14 so it is academic value to analyze the difference in muscle activity and exercise volume during traditional resistance exercise and ballistic resistance exercise through monitoring using analytical equipment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subject

Eight physically active, healthy males (mean ± SD: age: 26.21 ± 1.53 years; stature: 177.02 ± 2.11 cm; Weight: 78.12 ± 2.10 kg) and with no history of lower-limb injury in the past 12 months, were recruited to participate in this study. This study was approved by the institutional review board and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the selected subjects were fully educated about the significance of the study, the expected benefits, the inherent risks and inconveniences, and signed a consent form that they could be stopped at any time by their will.

Experimental procedure

After the selection of subjects, the maximum muscle strength (1RM) of the shoulder press was measured two weeks before the experiment, and then the weights of 65% 1RM were measured by one week before. On the day of the experiment, the subject attached a surface electrode after performing warm-up exercises and performed maximum repetition standing shoulder press under a specified load.

Number of repetition, exercise time, and muscle activity were measured during exercise. In this study, data were compared and analyzed until 15 times were performed according to the subjects who repeated the minimum number of times.

Standing shoulder press exercise

The starting posture of standing shoulder press started at the bar at the top of the shoulder, the foot was spread with the width of the hip, and the bar was held outwards by 2-5 cm with the width of the shoulder. Push the bar up and over the head until the arms are fully extended over the shoulders. It may be necessary to tilt the head back slightly to avoid hitting the chin or face. Slowly return to the starting position following the same path used for the upward movement.

In the ballistic motion condition, the knee flexion was performed 45 degrees in the starting position, and the bar was pushed up while the knee was extended. Standing shoulder press exercise as shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Electromyographic signal analysis. (A) Raw data. (B) Set the y-axis value to zero, then band-pass FFT filtering. (C) Root mean square application. (D) Mean value calculation.

Electromyography measurement method

An electromyography (EMG) machine (Korea, Laxtha) was used to investigate muscle activity during exercise, and the surface electrode was attached with reference to the study of Konrad.15 In order to obtain high-quality EMG data, the hair of the outer skin layer was shaved using a razor before electrode attachment, and the skin surface was cleaned with alcohol.

Electromyography was measured in three muscles, the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii, which are the prime movers of the bench press, following the method of previous studies. When attaching the electrodes, two were attached each to the site 1 cm apart from the insertion site of the intramuscular electrode.

The electrode attachment position of the middle deltoid was attached to the end of the acromion and the middle point of the deltoid tuberosity. Electrode of the erector spinae was attached to the middle point of lumber 4-5. Rectus femoris was attached to the intermediate point of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and the patella. The electrodes of gastrocnemius were attached to the center of the inner muscle of the calf. Triceps brachii–lateral head was attached to a point as far as 4 fingers wide from the posterior axillary fold, distal after the subject had their arms spread out in the Prone position. In addition, the wires connecting the electrodes and the electromyogram were arranged and fixed with tape, and then measured to minimize noise generation. It was monitored by designating the channel of the muscle at the electrode attachment site in the EMG program. Electrode attachment as shown in Fig. 1.

EMG signal analysis

Telescan software (ver. 3.15, Laxtha) was used to observe muscle activity from the measured EMG raw data. To calculate the root mean square (RMS) by extracting the measured raw signal data for each exercise set, the y-axis value was set to 0 after offset control of the raw EMG signal. The range was set as 10-400 Hz for band pass FFT-filtering. After that, the mean value was used after taking the square root. Electromyographic signal analysis are as shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2. Standing shoulder press exercise and electrode attachment. (A) Ballistic movement condition. (B) Non-ballistic movement condition. (C) Electrode attachment of middle deltoid and Triceps brachii lateral head. (D) Electrode attachment of erector spinae. (E) Electrode attachment of rectus femoris. (F) Electrode attachment of gastrocnemius medial head.

Statistical analysis

For the data measured in this experiment, the mean and standard deviation of all variables were calculated using the IBM SPSS Statistics (ver 22.0) statistical program. To verify all dependent variables according to exercise conditions, paired t-test. All statistical significance levels were set to less than α = .05.

RESULTS

Difference of number of repetitions

The paired t-test for number of repetitions during standing shoulder press exercise are as shown in Table 1. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of repetitions according to ballistic movement during standing shoulder press (p = .037). Difference in number of repetition as shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1 . Difference of number of repetitions

Non ballisticBallistictp
Repetitions16.43 ± 1.5121.14 ± 4.38?2.665.037

Values are means and SD.



Figure 3. In the ballistic condition, more repetitions were performed in shorter time. (A) Difference in number of repetition. (B) Difference in exercise time. *p <.05, difference between exercise condition determined by paired t-test.

Difference of exercise time

The paired t-test for exercise time during standing shoulder press exercise are as shown in Table 2. There was a statistically significant difference in the exercise time according to ballistic movement during standing shoulder press (p = .042). Exercise time are as shown in Fig. 3.

Table 2 . Difference of exercise time

Non ballisticBallistictp
Exercise Time (sec)32.24 ± 2.2827.14 ± 4.332.582.042

Values are means and SD.



Difference of muscle activity

The paired t-test for muscle activity during standing shoulder press exercise are as shown in Table 3. There was a statistically significant difference in the erector spinae (p = .002), rectus femoris (p = .001), gastrocnemius (p = .012) of activity according to ballistic movement during standing shoulder press. Difference in muscle activity are as shown in Fig. 4.

Table 3 . Difference of muscle activity (μV)

PartNon ballisticBallistictp
Upper extremity
Middle deltoid395.73 ± 311.05324.26 ± 259.242.345.057
Triceps brachii393.43 ± 226.57228.08 ± 47.902.040.087
Trunk
Erector spinae31.58 ± 8.9192.80 ± 29.64?5.201.002
Lower extremity
Rectus femoris42.57 ± 18.52198.37 ± 57.83?6.689.001
Gastrocnemius35.41 ± 12.2952.03 ± 18.17?3.536.012

Values are means and SD.



Figure 4. Difference in muscle activity. *p < .05, **p < .01, difference between exercise condition determined by paired t-test.
DISCUSSION

In resistance exercise, ballistic movement is also used in muscle power training to improve the power, or it is also applied as a trick action to avoid sticking points and to increase the amount of exercise in general training. In this study, the number of repetition, exercise time, and muscle activity of the exercise were analyzed to prove the actual effect of ballistic movement.

As a result of this study, the number of repetition of exercise was significantly higher in the ballistic condition, and the exercise performance time up to 15 times was significantly higher in the non-ballistic condition. These results are consistent with the study of Frost et al.16 that the ballistic condition produced much more velocity, force, and power out than the non-ballistic condition, and Saeterbakken & Fimland's study17 that reported that the shoulder press movement with fixed lower extremities and torso had a negative effect on absolute muscle performance. This is because exercise volume is associated with muscle fatigue.18 The total exercise time up to the maximum repetition was almost the same, so it is thought that it was possible to repeat about 5 times more during the spare time of about 5 seconds in the ballistic condition with fast repetition speed.

Muscle activity was not statistically significant in deltoid and triceps brachii, but was significantly higher in non-ballistic conditions. Muscle activity refers to neuromuscular activity by electrical signals transmitted to muscles,19 and increases as the recruitment of motor units increases or fatigue increases.20,21

This is because shoulder press exercise is a training method for training shoulder parts,1 and the higher muscle activity, the better the concentration of training.22 During the shoulder press exercise, deltoid generates the flexion of the glenohumeral joint to lift the humerus in the head direction, and the triceps brachii creates the extension motion of the humeroulnar joint to complete the motion of lifting the barbell above the head.23,24 Non-ballistic condition shows high muscle activity because the body segments except shoulder and elbow are fixed and weight should be pushed out only by deltoid and triceps brachii. The ballistic condition is interpreted to be relatively low burden of deltoid and triceps brachii because the whole body muscles are utilized.

On the other hand, the activity of the trunk extensor (erector spinae) and the lower extremity muscle (rectus femoris, gastrocnemius) muscle of the torso was significantly higher in the ballistic condition. This is because the pre-activation of the torso and lower extremity muscles is greater than the non-ballistic condition in preparation for the movement to be involved in the generation of force,25,26 and it is considered that the movement was made to efficiently transfer the force generated from the foot and ground to the upper body through the legs and torso to lift the bar.

In conclusion, it was confirmed that muscle activity and power output could be changed according to the use of recoil movement. If this is used in the field, it is better to use non-ballistic movement in isolation movement for hypertrophy and initial rehabilitation, and it is considered that it is better to use ballistic movement to improve sports activities and coordination.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Concept and design: KHK. Analysis and interpretation: KHK, BKK. Data collection: HJK. Writing the article: HJK, BKK. Critical revision of the article: BKK. Final approval of the article: KHK. Statistical analysis: HJJ. Obtained funding: HJK. Overall responsibility: BKK.

FUNDING

The present research was supported by the research fund of Dankook University in 2021.

References
  1. McKean, MR & Burkett, BJ (2015). Overhead shoulder press- in-front of the head or behind the head? J Sport Health Sci. 4, 250-7.
    CrossRef
  2. Rippetoe, M & Kilgore, L. Starting strength: basic barbell training, Wichita Falls: Aasgaard Company.
  3. Lake, JP, Mundy, PD & Comfort, P (2014). Power and impulse applied during push press exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 28, 2552-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Chiu, LZ & Salem, GJ (2006). Comparison of joint kinetics during free weight and flywheel resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 20, 555-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Loturco, I, Kobal, R, Maldonado, T, Piazzi, AF, Bottino, A & Kitamura, K, et al (2017). Jump squat is more related to sprinting and jumping abilities than olympic push press. Int J Sports Med. 38, 604-12.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Bishop, C, Chavda, S & Turner, A (2018). Exercise technique: The Push Press. Strength Cond J. 40, 104-8.
    CrossRef
  7. Bompa, TO & Buzzichelli, C. Periodization: theory and methodology of training, Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  8. Kawamori, N & Haff, GG (2004). The optimal training load for the development of muscular power. J Strength Cond Res. 18, 675-84.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Ishikawa, M & Komi, PV (2004). Effects of different dropping intensities on fascicle and tendinous tissue behavior during stretch-shortening cycle exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 96, 848-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Malisoux, L, Francaux, M, Nielens, H & Theisen, D (2006). Stretch-shortening cycle exercises: an effective training paradigm to enhance power output of human single muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol (1985). 100, 771-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Behm, DG & Sale, DG (1993). Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol (1985). 74, 359-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Yue, G & Cole, KJ (1992). Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol. 67, 1114-23.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Van Cutsem, M, Duchateau, J & Hainaut, K (1998). Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol. 513(Pt 1), 295-305.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Shin, YK & Eom, JB (2021). Optical imaging technology for real-time tumor monitoring. Med Laser. 10, 123-31.
    CrossRef
  15. Konrad, P (2005). The ABC of EMG - a practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography. Scottsdale: Noraxon Inc.
    CrossRef
  16. Frost, DM, Cronin, JB & Newton, RU (2008). Have we underestimated the kinematic and kinetic benefits of non-ballistic motion? Sports Biomech. 7, 372-85.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Saeterbakken, AH & Fimland, MS (2013). Effects of body position and loading modality on muscle activity and strength in shoulder presses. J Strength Cond Res. 27, 1824-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Kim, KH & Kim, BK (2021). Changes in total work, total work ratio, heart rate, and blood lactate during 75% 1-RM bench press exercise. Med Laser. 10, 153-60.
    CrossRef
  19. Song, MS, Lee, SJ & Woo, SH (2021). Giant thyroid mass excision using energy device and pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. Med Laser. 10, 115-9.
    CrossRef
  20. Kim, KH (2021). Efficient exercise volume analysis through number of repetitions and EMG response of agonist muscle during the bench press. Med Laser. 10, 220-8.
    CrossRef
  21. Choi, JE (2021). Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation (PBM) mediated via the stimulation of mitochondrial activity in peripheral nerve injuries. Med Laser. 10, 195-200.
    CrossRef
  22. Baechle, TR & Earle, RW. Weight training: steps to success, Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  23. Neumann, D. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system- e-book: foundations for rehabilitation. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences.
  24. Tillaar, RV & Sæterbakken, A (2012). The sticking region in three chest-press exercises with increasing degrees of freedom. J Strength Cond Res. 26, 2962-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Wallace, B & Janz, J (2009). Implications of motor unit activity on ballistic movement. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 4, 285-92.
    CrossRef
  26. Ebben, WP, Petushek, EJ, Fauth, ML & Garceau, LR (2010). EMG analysis of concurrent activation potentiation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 42, 556-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef


This Article

e-submission

Archives